Deep breath…

Sometimes, it’s impossible not to blog about something. Poor Jean Hannah Edelstein wrote in yesterday’s Guardian about the sad slog of working through a slush pile – although in fact, "working through" gives the impression of some kind of light at the end of the tunnel, while the reality is more of a Sisyphean battle against the encroaching tide of submissions. And P.J.H.E. couldn’t possibly have imagined the ire and the amount of responses from across the literate community, branding her and her supporters as "ingrates" and suggesting that they might give the job to someone who does like it. One helpful do-gooder suggested some of the following tips (among others): Publicising when (and when not) we consider submissions, stopping accepting submissions when the pile gets too high, carrying out consumer research to find out what the public wants, and pooling some of our promotion budgets to promote reading rather than individual books. 

Something like this on our website would seem to be the type of thing this commenter is suggesting, and rumour has it that it makes not a jot of difference on the daily sacks of submissions. Similarly, our finance, sales and editorial teams would be heartbroken at the thought that their careful research and years of experience count for nothing in the area of "consumer research". Or would this be better? And as for promoting reading – wouldn’t it be great if someone did something like this? Or this? Or this? Oh well, I guess you can’t please all of the people all of the time.

And while another commenter notes with an excellent simile that some of the people being handed the slush pile aren’t seasoned veterans, he’s offered comfort by someone reassuring anybody who writes only for "dedicated readers", rather than those of us who, say, have just wandered into a bookshop. If only we had the budget for some front-of-book warning stickers along that line.

But a few voices backed Jean – ranging from some hard truths, to a potential new TV series. I once heard the great Richard Briers giving advice to any potential actors: "Don’t act because you want to – act because you have to." It seems that may also hold true for writing, and thousands out there might be cursed to do something purely for the pleasure of it. There are worse ways to live…

Sam the Junior Copywriter

……………………………………………………………………

Remember that by posting a comment you are agreeing to the website Terms of Use. If you consider any content on this site to be inappropriate, please report it to Penguin Books by emailing reportabuse@penguin.co.uk

……………………………………………………………………

Here comes the sun (doo doo doo doo)

At the end of my first few days at Penguin, I’d like to share a few words (and not just with the coffee machine and the photocopy repair man.) I’ve been impressed and excited by lots of things in the past few days, from how welcoming everyone has been, to how quickly my stationery order arrived, to what a great (albeit temporary) location this is. Brick Lane is so full of life, it’s brilliant. Step outside the office and it looks, feels, even smells like somewhere that’s begging to be explored.

I’ve been finding myself getting excited about things that everyone here must be used to by now, like being surrounded by the best books (ever written), or the art on meeting room walls – you know, the little things. Most of all, I’m excited by what’s to come, including the re-launch of Jack Kerouac’s ‘On the Road’ to celebrate 50 years since its publication, and Steven Pinker’s new book on how language tells us more about ourselves than we might think (impressive stuff, and well worth knowing).

I’d like to think that I brought the sun with me this week, but seeing as it poured with rain all day on Monday, that would be unfair. I might be justified however, in saying that halfway though week one, from where I’m sitting, things are looking very sunny indeed.

Natalie Ramm
Brand new Penguin Press Marketing Manager

Words: short, musical, and spoken

Many thanks to Time Out for our Relentless sampler in this week’s edition of the magazine (one copy for each zone of the Penguin compound – normally just read nostalgically by the last person on the Time Out rota). A tiny thing of only 3 folded sheets (9 pages of book text), and approximately only 800 words, the Penguin copywriting team was taken aback by the wee-ness of it, but agreed that the blurb on the back was incredibly gripping, with real pull-power. The final line of the blurb is "He cries out and then utters six words that will change your life for ever… the first two lines of your address". Eeek. The blurb on the web, however, is a few lines longer, and mentions both the men chasing the main character and his missing wife, which had my Copywriting Colleague gasping with suspenseful delight. Is it too daring to do a sampler this short? Or does it show real confidence in the book’s premise? I’m sure the average fellow wouldn’t be bothered by the lack of branding on the sampler, but I found it v odd to have to search so hard for Bantam’s name. Still, it’s a strong contender for my Basket of Beach Books.

More beauty on t’interweb in the form of words (of a sort).

Special_topics_1Special_topics_3A glamorous trip to the impossibly glamorous audio studio last week as the recording for our Special Topics in Calamity Physics podcast progessed. The abridged book will be starting from June 4th, with a new episode each night for 2 weeks, as part of a Listen with Penguin scheme we’re dipping our toes into. More details to follow closer to the time, but do start dropping the name Amber Sealey into all your audio-related conversations: she’s quite the voice to listen to, don’t you know.

Sam the Junior Copywriter

……………………………………………………………………

Remember that by posting a comment you are agreeing to the website Terms of Use. If you consider any content on this site to be inappropriate, please report it to Penguin Books by emailing reportabuse@penguin.co.uk

……………………………………………………………………

Technology, luxury, comedy

Isn’t the internet a wonderful place? Lots of interesting debate on sleeping with the enemy vs. working from the inside for those nice folk at Innocent, plus the best pop-video ever, a neat piece on consumers’ feelings for advertisers, and some free reading from Headline.

I’m hooked on non-fiction at the moment, most recently the Penguin Press title Deluxe, out in August. Since reading it, I solemnly promise to never buy a $30,000 handbag ever again. Who knew the horrors that lay behind each "Made in Italy" leather good, or the cash behind those harmless-seeming fakies? Let’s all swap now, instead. Like a global jumble sale.

Finally, a good way to lose a few minutes this weekend: a voice of reason in a sea of madness.

Sam the Junior Copywriter

……………………………………………………………………

Remember that by posting a comment you are agreeing to the website Terms of Use. If you consider any content on this site to be inappropriate, please report it to Penguin Books by emailing reportabuse@penguin.co.uk

……………………………………………………………………

Talking about Talking

In the comments of this post Jennifer Jeffrey asks the very good (and very difficult) question, how do we influence word-of-mouth?

A few years ago, word of mouth was something that simply happened – the books business is full of stories about bestsellers that took publishing companies completely by surprise. Captain Corelli’s Mandolin is a prime example of a book that hardly received any significant push from its publisher with word-of-mouth pushing it to the top of the charts for several months. And for years this was the model that, occasionally, worked. When a publisher found itself shifting shedloads of a surprise hit we shrugged our shoulders, raised a glass of bubbly and put the book’s success down to a smile in our direction from the gods of publishing fortune.

Then, in 2000, The Cluetrain Manifesto was published, and I think that publishers (along with many other businesses) are only now beginning to appreciate the importance of the central tenet of the manifesto which I paste in full here. A powerful global conversation
has begun. Through the Internet, people are discovering and inventing new ways to share relevant knowledge with blinding speed. As a direct result, markets are getting smarter — and getting smarter faster than most companies
.’

Nowadays word of mouth happens everywhere, simultaneously and with incredible pace. Opinions are shared globally with the click of a mouse button, a mention in a popular blog can instantly send a book soaring up the Amazon Hot 100 and a bad marketing slogan can be ridiculed by thousands minutes after it is unveiled. The good news, for us as publishers and marketers of books, is that more people are talking about more stuff than ever before – the number of channels for conversation has multiplied dramatically thanks to the internet – so the challenge is to get people talking about our stuff!

How do we do this? Well, the main thing is to publish great books interestingly – hopefully then people will talk about them without too much prompting from us. Then, we can talk about them and start conversations about them, here on our blog, on our websites, on our podcast. We can try get our books and authors into places where people like to have conversations and share things they have found – on the social internet in places like youtube, myspace and secondlife. And we increasingly spend time looking for the places where conversations about books and about particular topics relevant to our books and authors are happening and try to talk to those conversationalists and share our news with them, though as this thread from uber-conversationalist Russell Davies shows, this can have mixed effects 😉

So, Jennifer, there is no easy answer to your question and it is a subject that many of us at Penguin spend lots of time trying to figure out. Ultimately, we’re very lucky to be working in the books business because books and authors are something that people are passionate about and talk passionately about and these conversations are ones we need to be and enjoy taking part in.

Jeremy Ettinghausen, Digital Publisher

PS In case you haven’t heard enough of my wittering about books and digital marketing, I’ll be speaking on this same subject at PSFK’s London Conference on June 1st.

……………………………………………………………………

Remember that by posting a comment you are agreeing to the website Terms of Use. If you consider any content on this site to be inappropriate, please report it to Penguin Books by emailing reportabuse@penguin.co.uk

……………………………………………………………………

 

Finding the known unknowns

Nassim Nicholas Taleb popped into the office last week to see how sales of his new book, The Black Swan are doing – more of which later. He is off to Las Vegas to debate with Charles Murray (author of The Bell Curve) on what the art masterpieces of the next fifty years will look like. It started me thinking what the great or most popular books of the next fifty years might look like — and how we will be able to spot them, buy them and sell them to booksellers who also see the possibility. In Taleb’s phrase, we are looking for Black Swans: statistically improbable events which share three principle characteristics: their unpredictability, their massive impact and after they have happened, and our seemingly innate desire to explain them, making them appear less random and more predictable than they actually are.

In bookselling the distribution of sales follows a tadpole pattern: most sales come from the top 5% of all titles published in a year (that number is approaching 200,000). No matter how many more titles are published, the number of titles that bring in the sales remain roughly the same. If that sounds like an argument to publish less, well, it is. Except that we don’t know which of the titles we publish will be hits. A dreadful admission from the inside, but the failures of the publishing world to spot every Black Swan are evident in the fact that the first Harry Potter was rejected by so many publishing houses and in the piles of C-list celeb bios filling up the remainder bins every January. What makes a bestseller? We select the books we’re going to do consumer advertising on, allocate trade marketing spend to get them in good slots in your stores and execute PR blitzes, but they are only a percentage of books we publish. Even with all that noise, a book can bomb. Another part of the bestseller equation is word-of-mouth, and that is something we can hope to influence, but can’t wholly control. I know at this point someone will point out that being selected for Richard & Judy’s Bookclub is the way to have a bestseller, but we don’t know what they will select (truly). So we publish a lot of books because we perceive that it lessens our risk (spread-betting) and because most of those books, if bought for the right amount, will be profitable even if they are not bestsellers.

The booksellers with whom I work have to make the same choices. If they don’t back a winner from the start, then they lose that all important market share and it’s not always easy to jump on board when the train’s already picked up speed. Take The Black Swan itself. It’s top five on Amazon.co.uk and we have had great support from some of our high street retailers who picked up on the potential size of its market and match to their customers early on. But not all. I’m not going to mention any names, but a couple didn’t see the opportunity and so now have to play catch-up to its success, having already given those who did see it (their competitors) an advantage. For a serious non-fiction title, such as The Black Swan, the internet now holds a very high market share as it can reach those audiences who read a review or profile in the Sunday Times and want to buy from their desks Monday morning. The success of Taleb’s book on Amazon indicates that if you connect word of the book (via publicity, word-of-mouth or sometimes having it in store, as people comparison shop) to a market (which for The Black Swan happily includes people involved in a huge spectrum of interests and professions from finance to physics, maths to marketing, and all areas of business, including, yes, publishing, as well as all those who love a book with a paradigm-shattering idea) but most importantly have availability at the time of demand (the job of publishing sales, supply chain and booksellers), then you might find yourself with a bestselling book.

To a certain extent, this reflects Chris Anderson’s assertion in The Long Tail that the internet with its advantage of having unlimited cyberspace to list books, offers the ideal opportunity to sell them. However, excluding the opportunity of print-on-demand, the success of internet bookselling requires very physical warehouse space with a supply chain able to respond quickly to customer demand which requires forecasting and pre-empting to the correct levels (how often have you gone to an internet site only to find the book you want is on a few days availability as supply can’t keep up with demand?). Bookshops have a limited physical space in which to stock and display books and the pressure of this can lead all booksellers (internet included to a certain extent) to miss the Black Swan. The more automated the forecasting system, the greater the danger of missing them, I’d suggest. You can plug in all the variables one time and you have a bestseller and repeat the exercise and be pushing a dog. The danger is that as costs escalate for all of us, we become more adverse to risk as failure costs us more and success might offer less value for money. We have to face uncertainty, accept that we don’t know, but keep the faith when something we feel is truly special comes our way.

Of course, none of this offers much insight on how to spot Black Swans and what the next ones might look like. I’d be interested in hearing your ideas on what you think the next big book phenomenon might be, post-Harry. In the meantime, it’s the fact that we can’t always spot Black Swans but that they are surely out there that makes this industry so exciting for me. Otherwise they’ll just replace us all with algorithms – ones without mortgages and holidays in  California to pay for, I’m sure.

If you’d like to read more about Black Swans, Taleb’s homepage is a useful starter, and Michael Allen has written about Black Swans in publishing on his blog.

Fiona Buckland
Penguin Press Sales Manager

……………………………………………………………………

Remember that by posting a comment you are agreeing to the website Terms of Use. If you consider any content on this site to be inappropriate, please report it to Penguin Books by emailing reportabuse@penguin.co.uk

……………………………………………………………………

Happy Birthday Helvetica

Helvetica, one of the best-known and most used typefaces in existence was 50 years old yesterday.

Here is a very small selection of Penguin covers that have used this classic font.

*Update for font nerds – apparently Penguin rarely used Helvetica itself, which only ‘escaped’ from Switzerland in the late 60s – throughout the 60s Penguin used a very very similar typeface called Standard which apparently differs from Helvetica mainly in the ‘s’s… *pushes glasses up nose*

Happy Birthday Helvetica

Paralle_2Science

**STOP PRESS** Ed2 develop new fasttrack publishing method

There was much excitement in my department, Penguin Copy-Editorial (popularly known as Editorial 2), on Thursday, when final proofs of the new Penguin Classics translation of the CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON (1781) were signed off. First proofs of Kant’s extraordinarily dense and difficult philosophical Meisterwerk arrived in the department on 27 March … 2001. Yes, after a mere six years, one month and a bit we, along with translator Marcus Weigelt, have finally satisfied ourselves that all is well with the text and that printing can now commence (though in a fit of nervousness over when we might actually finish, the publication date was last year moved to November 2007, so you’ll have to wait a while to get your hands on a copy).

Even before proofing, the copy-editing, designing and typesetting of the text had taken a good eight months. The complexities are mindboggling. For example, there are parts of the book where two different versions of the text (Kant produced a revised edition in 1787) need to run simultaneously, one above the other. The typesetter said it was ‘like one person trying to drive two trains at the same time on both central branches of the Northern Line, and having to make sure they collided at Camden Town’. Throughout the whole text there are indicators (of two types) showing the location of the start of each new page in the original two German editions, and these divisions are given alphanumerical expression in the ‘running feet’ at the bottom of the page. Not surprisingly, this was hugely difficult to get right first, or even third, time and took an enormous amount of checking.

The pressure was on, what with deadlines and all that, but we pulled through. It’s not something I’d like to have to go through again. It wasn’t just the difficulty of the setting, the actual words are a problem. I mean, I accidentally read the first of Kant’s paragraphs on ‘The Impossibility of a Sceptical Satisfaction of a Pure Reason Disunited with Itself’ and had to retire to bed for a week with a bad head. Still none the wiser, I might add. I bet the blind proofreader wishes she really had been blind (the ‘blind’ proofreader just reads the proofs without reference to the typescript; the ‘against copy’ proofeader compares every word in the proof to the typescript): she’s been shipped off to a sanatorium in Baden Baden or somewhere. HR are paying her bills, though, bless ’em.

While the text itself might be too much for most of us to stomach, the translator’s introduction is a work of comic genius. The opening few pages are some of the funniest I’ve read. At least in a Classics introduction. Unlike most intros, this one tells it to you straight: ‘You are not going to enjoy reading this book. No one ever has. Even professional philosophers can’t hack it.’ Which is strange, because of course it’s hugely influential and significant.

Richard Duguid
Editorial Manager

……………………………………………………………………

Remember that by posting a comment you are agreeing to the website Terms of Use. If you consider any content on this site to be inappropriate, please report it to Penguin Books by emailing reportabuse@penguin.co.uk

……………………………………………………………………

Once Missing, now found

ROLL UP, ROLL UP! The winner of Penguin’s trailer competition is young filmmaker Liam Garvo. Liam’s 30-second trailer will be shown before Spiderman 3 at Leicester Square’s Odeon every day between 11th-17th May, and 10 of the trailer crew will be partying until 8.35pm sharp on Monday 14th at his launch/screening at the Odeon, backed by literally tens of Penguin liggers desperate for his stardom to rub off on them. Hollywood, here we come.

Blood, gore and tears (mine)

Nothing gets the pulse of the Daily Mail racing like a bit of gratuitous violence in film, but how much slips by them when the horror is safely contained between two covers? This summer’s offering from Gang Tarantino seems chock full of the usual casual misogynistic bloodshed, making the film (by many accounts) both nasty and boring, but the debate gives it page after nasty, boring page of lavish coverage. Despite Miramax helping UK viewers lighten their wallets by splitting the original film in two, this may well be a big hit, thanks to the promise that young bucks may yet get their rocks off over Rose McGowan‘s rifle-limbed supervixen. The Grindhouse double-bill recalls something of Ballard’s Crash, as far as I can recall, although with less point and more "points". Is that possible? Some light reading last weekend became something of a nightmare – in a good way – as I devoured Monster Love, due out in January next year. The tale of one handsome young couple’s child-abusing and murdering ways, it made me scroll back through my own internal list of Potential Psycopaths I Have Known, and check my front door was bolted. It may be the best thing I’ve read for some time, with no glamour to the violence, just a cold, sickening edge of emptiness to the main couple. I suspect some fuss will be caused on publication, but the likelihood of 2 million people catching this is slim (though not impossible). So does the narrower reception make the book’s violence acceptable? Well, however graphic the descriptions may be, it’s spelled out again and again, both the consequences of the abuse and the reactions of the surrounding community. It seems hard to believe that Tarantino, Roth and co. can claim that same all-round understanding. Ultimately, though, it boils down to one thing – is it any good? In the case of Grindhouse, I have to grunt a Daily Mail "not seen it", but Monster Love is something I couldn’t put down for a whole weekend, even if I read from behind my fingers.

Keep them peeled for this, next spring.

Sam the Junior Copywriter